
NAUT tracks 20 Australia crypto companies in its crypto and Web3 company database, read on 5 November 2026: 10 investment firms and 10 project-side teams, from the exchange Independent Reserve to the Algorand bridge Algomint. They come from 24 company rows NAUT tags with country Australia, and every one of the 20 carries an X handle on file, with a domain on 17 of them.
How this list was built: NAUT read its own company rows tagged country Australia on 5 November 2026 and kept 20 of the 24. 3 were left out because the row holds a personal name with a personal-style X handle and no domain, which reads as an angel investor filed as a company row. 1 more was left out because its own stored summary describes an independent Australian wealth management firm focused on client-first advice, so this article does not assert it as a crypto investor. Country here is the country field NAUT stores on the row, not a verified registration address. Sector tags, descriptions, domains and handles in the tables below are the values NAUT held on 5 November 2026, and a dash or "None on file" means the field is empty on that row. Written by NAUT Research.
Of the 20 rows, 7 had a claim put to an outside source on 5 November 2026. 4 of those cleared the bar this article uses, a quote found on the cited page or a second source naming the same thing, so 4 rows carry an outside detail below. The other 3 checked rows and the 13 rows that were never put to an outside source stay as NAUT's own record, and nothing beyond the database is claimed for them.
How was this Australia crypto companies list built, side by side?
NAUT stores each company row with a type, so the first split a dealmaker needs is which side of the table a row sits on. The last 3 columns count the rows that carry that field on NAUT: a description, a domain, an X handle.
| Side | Rows | Description | Domain | X handle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Projects | 10 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| Investors | 10 | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| Total kept | 20 | 8 | 17 | 20 |
The 4 rows left out of the 24 are not in these counts. 12 distinct sector tags appear across the 10 project-side rows; the 10 investor rows carry no sector tag of their own, and NAUT's own sector rollup for this set counts them under Investors and VC.
Which Australia crypto companies are project-side teams?
These are the 10 rows NAUT types as a project, with the sector tags and the one-line description each row holds.
| Company | Sector tags | NAUT's record |
|---|---|---|
| CEX (Centralized Exchange) | Cryptocurrency exchange | |
| DeFi, Stablecoins | Bringing BTC, ETH to Algorand | |
| DePIN, AI, Infrastructure | A Universal DePin Ecosystem | |
| Neobank | FinTech company powered by blockchain technology | |
| Infrastructure | Smart contract development firm | |
| Tools | Event ticketing platform | |
| SocialFi, Gaming | Fitness platform | |
| Tools, Payment | None on file | |
| Media | None on file | |
| None on file | None on file |
The X handle each row carries on NAUT, in table order: @indepreserve, @algomint_io, @azen_protocol, @blockearner, @0xblockfold, @eventflohq, @veda_vital, @habittrade, @Surgence_io and @pocket_dragons_.
2 of these rows also name a chain on NAUT: aZen Protocol on Arbitrum and Algomint on Algorand. 3 rows carry no description, so the handle is the only thing to read before an outreach note, and 2 of those 3 carry no domain either. VitalVEDA and Eventflo sit in crypto sector buckets on NAUT while their own one-line record names a consumer product, a fitness platform and an event ticketing platform, so read the row before pitching either as an on-chain team.
Outside checks were run on 4 of these 10 rows and 1 of the 4 cleared the bar. The Fireblocks press release dated 29 September 2023 says "Fireblocks announced the acquisition of BlockFold, a smart contract development and consulting firm", which is why the NAUT row reads BlockFold (acq. by Fireblocks). For Independent Reserve, blockearner and Algomint, the check could not place its quote on the page it cited, so those 3 lines stay as NAUT's own record.
Tag depth decides whether a row shows up in a sector filter: aZen Protocol carries 3 tags, 3 rows carry 2, 5 rows carry 1, and Pocket_Dragons_ carries none, so it is reachable only by name or handle.
Which Australia crypto companies are investment firms?
These are the 10 rows NAUT types as an investor. 1 of the 10 carries a description, none carries a sector tag of its own, and all 10 carry a domain, which is the fastest route to a thesis page.
| Firm | Description | Domain |
|---|---|---|
| On file | kosmos.vc | |
| None on file | coinstash.com.au | |
| None on file | frontierresearch.io | |
| None on file | atesis.vc | |
| None on file | blowfishstudios.com | |
| None on file | magnetcapital.com.au | |
| None on file | maxcapgroup.com.au | |
| None on file | spaceship.com.au | |
| None on file | upsidedao.com.au | |
| None on file | yorkstcapital.vc |
The 1 description on file is Kosmos Ventures: a multi-strategy digital-asset firm established in 2017, on blockchain infrastructure and DeFi and GameFi. The X handle each firm carries on NAUT, in table order: @kosmosvc, @Coinstash_AU, @frontierres01, @AtesisCapital, @blowfishstudios, @Magnet_Cap, @MaxCapGroup, @SpaceshipAU, @0xUpside and @yorkstcapital.
3 of these firms carry an outside detail that cleared this article's bar. Kosmos Ventures is described by the check as a multi-strategy digital-asset investment firm founded in 2017, matching the 2017 date in its own NAUT description. Coinstash is described as an Australian cryptocurrency exchange with headquarters in Brisbane, so a row that sits on NAUT's investor side is an exchange by product. Frontier Research is described as an independent research and advisory group working on crypto and digital assets, closer to a research desk than a cheque. The other 7 firms had no outside check, so treat each one as NAUT's record plus its own site.
What does this tell a BD team working Australian crypto companies?
- The addressable set is small and split evenly: 10 project-side teams and 10 investment firms, so a single sequence for all 20 is the wrong shape.
- Coverage is thin on text and strong on handles. 8 of the 20 rows carry a description, 17 carry a domain, and all 20 carry an X handle.
- The 2 rows with the clearest product line, Independent Reserve as an exchange and Algomint as an Algorand bridge, are the easiest first-touch targets because the opener writes itself.
- 1 row is already an exit: BlockFold (acq. by Fireblocks) was acquired in September 2023, so route that conversation to Fireblocks.
- Split the list10 rows are investment firms and 10 are project-side teams, so write 2 sequences, never 1.
- Read the record first8 of the 20 rows carry a description, so open Independent Reserve, Algomint, aZen Protocol and blockearner before the blank rows.
- Open the handleAll 20 rows carry an X handle on file, the one channel every row on this list has.
- Unlock the channelNAUT's company pages carry the people it holds, and a paid plan reveals their verified Telegram, email and LinkedIn.
What does this tell a founder raising from Australian crypto investors?
- 10 investor rows is the whole Australia-tagged investor set NAUT holds after the 4 removals, so a raise built on local money alone has a short target list.
- Only 1 of the 10, Kosmos Ventures, states a thesis on its NAUT row, naming blockchain infrastructure and DeFi and GameFi. The other 9 give a domain and a handle, so the thesis read happens on their own site.
- Row type is not product type here. Coinstash sits on the investor side and its own site describes a Brisbane exchange, and Frontier Research reads as a research and advisory group, so 2 of the 10 are not plain cheque writers.
- Start with the stated thesisKosmos Ventures is the 1 of 10 investor rows with a description on NAUT, and it names blockchain infrastructure and DeFi and GameFi.
- Check what the firm actually doesCoinstash is an exchange by product and Frontier Research is a research group, so 2 of the 10 are not a plain cheque.
- Work every front doorAll 10 investor rows carry a domain and an X handle, so each one has a public starting point.
- Find the partnerEach firm's NAUT page lists the people NAUT holds there, which is who the intro has to reach.
Related reading on NAUT: Crypto VC Singapore: 11 funds, 1 with a 2026 round and How to find decision makers in a company: 5 steps for crypto.
Can you pull this data through the NAUT API?
Yes, row by row. NAUT's API has no country filter in its documented parameters, so this list is pulled by slug: GET https://api.naut.so/v1/projects/independent-reserve returns that company with its team, and GET https://api.naut.so/v1/investors/kosmos-ventures returns a fund with its team and portfolio, which is 5 credits a call, so 100 credits for all 20 rows against the 3,000 credits on the $49 Essential plan (docs, pricing). Verified Telegram, email and LinkedIn for the people on these pages unlock on any paid NAUT plan, so you can start a 7-day trial and reveal them.
Australia crypto companies FAQ
How many Australia crypto companies does NAUT track?
NAUT holds 24 company rows tagged country Australia and this list keeps 20 of them, read on 5 November 2026: 10 investment firms and 10 project-side teams. 3 rows were left out as a personal name filed as a company row, and 1 as a wealth management firm by its own stored summary.
Which crypto companies are based in Australia?
On NAUT's record as of 5 November 2026, the Australia-tagged project rows are Independent Reserve, Algomint, aZen Protocol, blockearner, BlockFold (acq. by Fireblocks), Eventflo, VitalVEDA, HabitTrade, Surgence Labs and Pocket_Dragons_. Country is the field NAUT stores on each row, so confirm a registration address with the company before a contract.
Which Australian crypto exchanges are on NAUT?
2 of the 20 rows are exchanges by product: Independent Reserve, whose NAUT record reads cryptocurrency exchange and carries the CEX sector tag, and Coinstash, which an outside check on 5 November 2026 described as an Australian cryptocurrency exchange with headquarters in Brisbane even though NAUT types the row as an investor.
Which Australian crypto investors does NAUT list?
10 investment firms: Kosmos Ventures, Coinstash, Frontier Research, Atesis Capital, Blowfish Studios, Magnet Capital, MaxCap Group, Spaceship, Upside DAO and York St Capital. All 10 carry a domain and an X handle on NAUT, and 1 carries a description.
Where can I find these 20 Australian crypto companies and the people to contact?
Each of the 20 rows has its own NAUT page with the people NAUT holds there, and the same records come back through the API by slug, 5 credits a call. Verified Telegram, email and LinkedIn unlock on any paid NAUT plan, so you can start a 7-day trial and reveal the channels on the pages in this list.
Sources
- NAUT company database, 24 rows tagged country Australia, read 5 November 2026.
- Fireblocks press release, 29 September 2023: Fireblocks acquires tokenization firm BlockFold.
- Coinstash about page: coinstash.com.au/about-us, with Crunchbase as the second source.
- Kosmos Ventures profile: Tracxn, with Crunchbase as the second source.
- Frontier Research: frontier.tech, with Crunchbase as the second source.
- NAUT API endpoints and pricing: naut.so/docs/api and naut.so/pricing.
aZen Protocol
HabitTrade
VitalVEDA
Algomint
blockearner
Eventflo
Surgence Labs
Independent Reserve
BlockFold (acq. by Fireblocks)